Observational studyBMC ophthalmology2025
Comparative evaluation of anterior segment optical coherence tomography and in vivo confocal microscopy for Kayser-Fleischer rings assessment in Wilson disease.
Observational study in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in evaluating Kayser-Fleischer (KF) rings in patients with Wilson disease (WD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective observational study enrolled 36 subjects (16 women) and 36 controls (16 women). All participants underwent both AS-OCT and IVCM, and the results were analyzed using McNemar's test to assess diagnostic concordancet.
resultsKF rings were not detected either with AS-OCT or with IVCM in any of the controls. Among the WD patients, seven subjects who did not show KF rings on AS-OCT were found to have them on IVCM (p < 0.05), six of whom were identified diagnosed with hepatic WD.
conclusionBoth AS-OCT and IVCM can provide objective assessment of KF rings. IVCM offers better accuracy compared to AS-OCT, particularly for hepatic WD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.