ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Creating an effective DNA identification system for discriminating cherries (Prunus subgenus Cerasus).
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction: Creating an effective DNA identification system for discriminating cherries (Prunus subgenus Cerasus).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative chloroplast genomics clarifies the taxonomic status and supports molecular identification ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Comparative plastome analysis and phylogenetic relationships of ChineseFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCherries, a subgenus of Cerasus within Rosaceae, as fruit trees with high economic value and elegant garden plants, have broad prospects for development and utilization. However, traditional morphology and molecular data have struggled to accurately identify cherry species due to their extensive overlap in the distribution, frequent hybridization, both open and closed flowers, hysteranthy and limited species coverage, hindering the advancement of the cherry industry. In this study, 61 well-documented cherry species were collected and whole chloroplast genome data was used to develop an effective DNA identification system for precise species identification.
results36 new cherry chloroplast genomes were added to the public database, resulting in the most comprehensive phylogenetic relationship of cherry species to date. While whole chloroplast genome data achieved an 85.26% species identification success rate, it did not fully resolve all species identification. Relying solely on whole chloroplast genome data is resource-intensive. Therefore, we explored using highly variable regions, species-specific SNPs, and structural variations for accurate species identification. This study revealed that 14 newly developed DNA barcodes could identify 71.88% of cherry samples, while 106 SNPs and Indels allowed for precise identification of 59 out of 61 cherry species.
conclusionsThis study not only clarified the phylogenetic relationships of major cherry species but also developed a precise identification system, providing a robust tool for accurate species identification and laying a solid foundation for breeding and the broader promotion of cherry species. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.