Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40234713›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2025

Circulating tumour DNA and circulating tumour cells in bladder cancer - from discovery to clinical implementation.

Sia V Lindskrog, Trine Strandgaard, Iver Nordentoft, Matthew D Galsky, Thomas Powles, Mads Agerbæk, Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen, Catherine Alix-Panabières, Lars Dyrskjøt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. ctDNA Dynamics and Recurrence Patterns after Organ-Sparing Trimodality Therapy for Bladder Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sia V Lindskrog *Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Trine Strandgaard *Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Iver NordentoftDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Matthew D GalskyTisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7655-9378
Thomas PowlesBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Mads AgerbækDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-6136
Jørgen Bjerggaard JensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Catherine Alix-PanabièresLaboratory of Rare Circulating Human Cells - Liquid Biopsy Laboratory, Site Unique de Biology, University Medical Center of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6401-2903
Lars DyrskjøtDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. lars@clin.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-7061-9851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsies, indicating the sampling of body fluids rather than solid-tissue biopsies, have the potential to revolutionize cancer care through personalized, noninvasive disease detection and monitoring. Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are promising blood-based biomarkers in bladder cancer. Results from several studies have shown the clinical potential of ctDNA and CTCs in bladder cancer for prognostication, treatment-response monitoring, and early detection of minimal residual disease and disease recurrence. Following successful clinical trial evaluation, assessment of ctDNA and CTCs holds the potential to transform the therapeutic pathway for patients with bladder cancer - potentially in combination with the analysis of urinary tumour DNA - through tailored treatment guidance and optimized disease surveillance.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNANeoplastic Cells, CirculatingUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.