ArticleScientific reports2025
Rapid diagnosis of membranous nephropathy based on kidney tissue Raman spectroscopy and deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in membranous nephropathy: transforming clinical management toward precision medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The lipid-podocyte axis: emerging clues in membranous nephropathy pathogenesis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Development of a rapid and novel diagnostic technique for cardiac amyloidosis using Raman spectroscopy.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Membranous nephropathy (MN) is one of the most common glomerular diseases. Although the diagnostic method based on serum PLA2R antibodies has gradually been applied in clinical practice, only 52-86% of PLA2R-associated MN patients show positive anti-PLA2R antibodies. Therefore, renal biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing MN. However, the renal biopsy procedure is highly complex and involves multiple steps, including tissue sampling, fixation, dehydration, embedding, sectioning, PAS staining, Masson trichrome staining, and silver staining. Each step requires precise technique from laboratory personnel, as any error can affect the quality of the final tissue sections and, consequently, the diagnosis. As a result, there is an urgent need to develop a method that enables rapid diagnosis after renal biopsy. Previous studies have shown that Raman spectroscopy offers promising results for diagnosing MN, exhibiting high sensitivity and specificity when applied to human serum and urine samples. In this study, we propose a rapid diagnostic method combining Raman spectroscopy of mouse kidney tissue with a CNN-BiLSTM deep learning model. The model achieved 98% accuracy, with specificity and sensitivity of 98.3%, providing a novel auxiliary tool for the pathological diagnosis of MN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.