ArticleScientific reports2025
Examination of the impact of curiosity and fatigue on brain condition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closed-Loop Neuromodulation for Brain Fatigue: From Real-Time Biomarkers to Adaptive Intervention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- White Matter Integrity of the Corpus Callosum Mediates the Association Between Aging and Skin Condition.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fractional Anisotropy of Cingulum Cingulate Mediates the Relationship Between Happiness and Work Performance in Healthy Individuals.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With a growing emphasis on cognitive well-being, this study investigates factors influencing brain health, measured by Fractional Anisotropy Brain Healthcare Quotient (FA-BHQ). We find a positive correlation between curiosity, assessed by the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II), and brain health as indicated by FA-BHQ. Conversely, fatigue, evaluated using the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS), demonstrates a negative correlation with brain health. Furthermore, curiosity and fatigue serve as significant mediators in the relationship between these factors and FA-BHQ, respectively. Specific brain regions, including the corpus callosum, internal capsule, fornix, and posterior thalamic radiation, show significant negative correlations with fatigue, while the corpus callosum, fornix, internal capsule, corona radiata, external capsule, cingulum, and posterior thalamic radiation exhibit significant positive correlations with curiosity. Notably, this study highlights that more brain regions exhibit significant correlations with curiosity compared to fatigue, shedding light on the growing recognition of curiosity's role in influencing brain health and emphasizing the importance of considering curiosity in the research on cognitive well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.