Trial reportScientific reports2025
Effects of multisensory simultaneity judgment training on the comprehension and cortical processing of speech in noise: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding speech in noise can be facilitated by integrating auditory and visual speech cues. Audiovisual temporal acuity, which can be indexed by the temporal binding window (TBW), is critical for this process and can be enhanced through simultaneity judgment training. We hypothesized that multisensory training would narrow the TBW and improve speech understanding in noise. Participants were randomized to receive either training and testing (n = 15) or testing-only (n = 15) over three days. Trained participants demonstrated significant narrowing in their mean TBW size (403ms to 345ms; p = 0.030), whereas control participants did not (409ms to 474ms; p = 0.061). Although there were no group-level changes in word recognition scores, trained participants with larger TBW decreases exhibited larger improvements in auditory word recognition in noise (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.