ReviewLeukemia2025
Prognostic scoring systems in chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Review in Leukemia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in China (2025)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Guideline
- Matching-adjusted indirect comparison between asciminib and flumatinib as first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia in China.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
- Chronic myeloid leukemia in resource-limited settings: Navigating treatment challenges amid limited tyrosine kinase inhibitor access.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Fractal-fractional modeling of chronic myelogenous leukemia immune dynamics using Laguerre wavelets method.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Radiological Approach to Splenomegaly: Etiologies, Pathophysiologies, and Diagnostic Strategies.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Observational
- The prognostic value of health-related quality of life for early molecular response in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: analysis of the GIMEMA-SUSTRENIM trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prognostic scores are an important tool in medical statistics. In chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), prognostic models have existed for many years, enabling the classification of patients into groups that can be clearly differentiated in terms of their prognosis. However, over time, the focus of these models has shifted from solely survival outcomes to a broader range of diverse endpoints. This review explores the development and applications of these scores, offering recommendations for their use, and looks ahead to potential future advancements in the field. As the landscape of CML treatment evolves with newer therapeutic options, it is crucial to adapt prognostic models to reflect not only survival rates but also other important clinical milestones such as molecular remission, progression-free survival, and CML-related survival. The continued refinement of these tools, alongside international validation efforts, will be essential in providing clinicians with more accurate and individualized patient prognostication, ultimately improving therapeutic decision-making and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.