ArticleScientific reports2025
Maize yield estimation in Northeast China's black soil region using a deep learning model with attention mechanism and remote sensing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multi-source remote sensing and machine learning framework for maize mapping and yield estimation in fragmented Loess gully regions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of maize yields is crucial for effective crop management. In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning framework (CNNAtBiGRU) for estimating maize yield, which is applied to typical black soil areas in Northeast China. This framework integrates a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN), bidirectional gated recurrent units (BiGRU), and an attention mechanism to effectively characterize and weight key segments of input data. In the predictions for the most recent year, the model demonstrated high accuracy (R² = 0.896, RMSE = 908.33 kg/ha) and exhibited strong robustness in both earlier years and during extreme climatic events. Unlike traditional yield estimation methods that primarily rely on remote sensing vegetation indices, phenological data, meteorological data, and soil characteristics, this study innovatively incorporates anthropogenic factors, such as Degree of Cultivation Mechanization (DCM), reflecting the rapid advancement of agricultural modernization. The relative importance analysis of input variables revealed that Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF), and DCM were the most influential factors in yield prediction. Furthermore, our framework enables maize yield prediction 1-2 months in advance by leveraging historical patterns of environmental and agricultural variables, providing valuable lead time for decision-making. This predictive capability does not rely on forecasting future weather conditions but rather captures yield-relevant signals embedded in early-season data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.