ArticleScientific reports2025
High tissue specificity of lncRNAs maximises the prediction of tissue of origin of circulating DNA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Decoding the lncRNA World: Comprehensive Approaches to lncRNA Structure and Interactome Studies.Cells · 2026Review
- New insight into RNA biomarkers in neuropathic pain: a clinician-neuroscientist roadmap to translational testing and treatment monitoring a clinical review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Characterization of full-length long noncoding RNAs and identification of virus-responsive lncRNAs inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have made it possible to envision a translational application of plasma DNA sequencing in cancer diagnosis and monitoring. However, the extremely low concentration of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) fragments among the total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) remains a formidable challenge to overcome and statistical models have yet to be improved enough to become of practical use. In this study, we set about appraising the predictive value of a variety of binary classification models based on cfDNA sequencing using fragmentation features extracted around transcription start sites (TSSs). We investigated (1) features summarising mapped fragment density around each TSS, (2) long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) genes versus coding genes and (3) selection criteria to generate gene classes to be assigned by the model. Given that, in healthy samples, most of the cfDNA comes from lymphomyeloid lineages, we could identify the model parametrisation with the best accuracy in those lineages using publicly available datasets of healthy patients' cfDNA. Our results show that (1) the way tissue-specific gene classes are defined matters more than what fragmentation features are included, and (2) in particular, lncRNAs are more tissue specific than coding genes and stand out in terms of both sensitivity and specificity in our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.