ArticleScientific reports2025
An integrative scoring approach for prioritization of rare autism spectrum disorder candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Yield and Genotype-Phenotype Overlap in Pediatric Autism Spectrum Disorder Patients Using Whole-Exome Sequencing and Phenotype-Driven Variant Interpretation: A Single-Center Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association between rare, genetic variants linked to autism and ultrasonography fetal anomalies in children with autism spectrum disorder.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Discerning clinically relevant autism spectrum disorder (ASD) candidate variants from whole-exome sequencing (WES) data is complex, time-consuming, and labor-intensive. To this end, we developed AutScore, an integrative prioritization algorithm of ASD candidate variants from WES data and assessed its performance to detect clinically relevant variants. We studied WES data from 581 ASD probands, and their parents registered in the Azrieli National Center database for Autism and Neurodevelopment Research. We focused on rare allele frequency (< 1%) and high-quality proband-specific variants affecting genes associated with ASD or other neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). We developed AutScore and AutScore.r and assigned each variant based on their pathogenicity, clinical relevance, gene-disease association, and inheritance patterns. Finally, we compared the performance of both AutScore versions with the rating of clinical experts and the NDD variant prioritization algorithm, AutoCaSc. Overall, 1161 rare variants distributed in 687 genes in 441 ASD probands were evaluated by AutScore with scores ranging from - 4 to 25, with a mean ± SD of 5.89 ± 4.18. AutScore.r cut-off of ≥ 0.335 performs better than AutoCaSc and AutScore in detecting clinically relevant ASD variants, with a detection accuracy rate of 85% and an overall diagnostic yield of 10.3%. Five variants with AutScore.r of ≥ 0.335 were distributed in five novel ASD candidate genes. AutScore.r is an effective automated ranking system for ASD candidate variants that could be implemented in ASD clinical genetics pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.