ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced individual difference of functional brain network induced by volitional eyes closing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex difference in the neural correlates of volitional eyes closing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Precision neurodiversity: personalized brain network architecture as a window into cognitive variability.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volitional eyes closing (EC) can promote the interoceptive thoughts that vary considerably among individuals. Although this behavior is known to recruit a large-scale brain network as its neural underpinning, individual variability in such network recruitment remains unexplored. Here, we compared the intersubject variability in functional connectivity (IVFC) between the EC and eyes opening conditions. It was found that the IVFC significantly increased during the EC condition, which could be replicated in different public datasets and multi-resolution parcellations. Moreover, the EC-enhanced IVFC focused on selective subsets of FCs, with predominant impact on the default-mode, dorsal attention, and visual networks. Finally, a positive relationship was discovered between EC-enhanced IVFC and deep involvement in the task-unrelated thoughts that was measured with an additional dataset. Collectively, these results suggested that enhanced individual difference characterize the functional network of volitional EC, with widespread impact on cognitive systems and potential connection to task-unrelated thoughts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.