Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40234520›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An integrated approach of feature selection and machine learning for early detection of breast cancer.

Jing Zhu, Zhenhang Zhao, Bangzheng Yin, Canpeng Wu, Chan Yin, Rong Chen, Youde Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jing ZhuExperimental Centre, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Zhenhang ZhaoElectronics and Communication Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Bangzheng YinInstitute of Information Engineering, Guangzhou Railway Polytechnic, Guangzhou, 510430, China.
Canpeng WuElectronics and Communication Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Chan YinThe Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang, 422000, China.
Rong ChenThe Central Hospital of Shaoyang, Shaoyang, 422000, China. chenrong197510@163.com.
Youde DingSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China. dydbluesky_ky@126.com.

Funding

Basic Research Project of Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau in 2022 202201011668Hunan Provincial Scientific Research Program of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2021110the second batch of the Industry-University Cooperation Collaborative Education Project of the Ministry of Education in 2018 201802212018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer ranks among the most prevalent cancers in women globally, with its treatment efficacy heavily reliant on the early identification and diagnosis of the disease. The importance of early detection and diagnosis cannot be overstated in enhancing the survival prospects of those afflicted with breast cancer. With the increasing application of machine learning technology in the medical field, algorithm-based diagnostic tools provide new possibilities for early prediction of breast cancer. In this study, we introduced a novel feature selection approach, which leverages Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values as the basis for Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), utilizing a Random Forest (RF) algorithm within the RFE framework. To address the data imbalance challenge, we incorporated Borderline-SMOTE1. The efficacy of the proposed method was assessed using five machine learning models, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), applied to the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Diagnosis (WBCD) datasets. Optimizing hyperparameters of five models using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. In the datasets, 26 features were filtered using our recommended algorithm, the LightGBM-PSO model demonstrated an outstanding performance. The model demonstrated an impressive accuracy of 99.0% in differentiating between benign and malignant cases, boasting a specificity and precision of 100%, a recall rate of 97.40%, an F-measure of 98.68%, an AUC of 0.9870, and a 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of 0.9808. Subsequently, we developed a corresponding online tool (https://breast-cancer-prediction-tool-cgbjlhkns7yig6bmzvztmc.streamlit.app/) based on this model for predicting the risk of breast cancer. Feature selection using recommended algorithm and optimization of the LightGBM model through PSO can significantly enhance the accuracy of breast cancer prediction. This could potentially improve the prognosis for patients diagnosed with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMachine LearningAlgorithmsFemaleHumansSupport Vector MachineBorderline-SMOTE1Breast cancerLightGBMPSORFESHAP

Identifiers

PMID40234520
PMCPMC12000346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.