ArticleScientific reports2025
An integrated approach of feature selection and machine learning for early detection of breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Pipeline for Mammography-Based Breast Cancer Detection: An Integrated Systematic Review and Large-Scale Experimental Validation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- SFEL a machine learning framework for forecasting radar backscatter based ground deformation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Designing novel FAK inhibitors targeting gastric cancer: a combined approach using machine learning, docking analysis, molecular dynamics simulations, and experimental validation.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Resilient Sinkhorn-Based Optimal Transport Late Fusion Framework for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.Cancer informatics · 2026Article
- An explainable-AI framework reveals novel lncRNAs specific for breast cancer subtypes.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Breast cancer classification based on microcalcifications using dual branch vision transformer fusion.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrating tumor location into artificial intelligence-based prognostic models in cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Optimized breast cancer diagnosis using self-adaptive quantum metaheuristic feature selection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Interpretable machine learning model to predict 90-day radiographically confirmed pneumonia after chemotherapy initiation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: development and internal validation of a single-center cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer ranks among the most prevalent cancers in women globally, with its treatment efficacy heavily reliant on the early identification and diagnosis of the disease. The importance of early detection and diagnosis cannot be overstated in enhancing the survival prospects of those afflicted with breast cancer. With the increasing application of machine learning technology in the medical field, algorithm-based diagnostic tools provide new possibilities for early prediction of breast cancer. In this study, we introduced a novel feature selection approach, which leverages Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values as the basis for Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), utilizing a Random Forest (RF) algorithm within the RFE framework. To address the data imbalance challenge, we incorporated Borderline-SMOTE1. The efficacy of the proposed method was assessed using five machine learning models, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), applied to the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Diagnosis (WBCD) datasets. Optimizing hyperparameters of five models using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. In the datasets, 26 features were filtered using our recommended algorithm, the LightGBM-PSO model demonstrated an outstanding performance. The model demonstrated an impressive accuracy of 99.0% in differentiating between benign and malignant cases, boasting a specificity and precision of 100%, a recall rate of 97.40%, an F-measure of 98.68%, an AUC of 0.9870, and a 10-fold cross-validation accuracy of 0.9808. Subsequently, we developed a corresponding online tool (https://breast-cancer-prediction-tool-cgbjlhkns7yig6bmzvztmc.streamlit.app/) based on this model for predicting the risk of breast cancer. Feature selection using recommended algorithm and optimization of the LightGBM model through PSO can significantly enhance the accuracy of breast cancer prediction. This could potentially improve the prognosis for patients diagnosed with breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.