ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of simultaneous physical and auditory stressors on cardiorespiratory response.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In occupational medicine, monitoring individual stress-related physiological responses is an effective tool for minimizing health risks at the workplace. From an audiology perspective, this particularly concerns the effects of auditory stress, which leads to increased listening effort with subsequent hearing fatigue. A study was conducted to investigate whether cardio-respiratory responses can detect the effects of a multi-level combination of physical and auditory stressors. To investigate their measurability and determine whether an interaction exists, a selection of cardio-respiratory vital parameters such as heart rate, features in the time and frequency domain of the heart rate variability, breathing rate, respiratory minute volume, and the respiratory quotient were analyzed. The results showed a significant main effect of physical stress on all assessed parameters. Auditory stress demonstrated a significant impact on breathing frequency, root mean square of successive differences of interbeat intervals, and the power components of the low and high frequency bands of the heart rate variability. No interaction between auditory and physical stressors was observed across any of the examined parameters. From these results we conclude that physiological responses to different sources of stress can be recorded within selected vital parameters, independent of external stimuli such as ambient noise. In an occupational context, we see potential in tracking individual auditory stress by monitoring cardio-respiratory parameters, especially breathing patterns. By knowing the individual (auditory) stress level, conclusions could be drawn about the worker's ability to concentrate and further measures could be taken to combat safety risks in the work environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.