Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40234501›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The living Barents Sea response to peak-warming and subsequent cooling.

E Eriksen, B Husson, G Skaret, R B Ingvaldsen, P Dalpadado, E Johannesen, L L Jørgensen, B Bogstad, A V Dolgov, D V Prozorkevich and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

E EriksenInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway. elena.eriksen@hi.no.
B HussonInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
G SkaretInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
R B IngvaldsenInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
P DalpadadoInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
E JohannesenInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
L L JørgensenInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
B BogstadInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
A V DolgovPolar Branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography ("PINRO" Named After N.M. Knipovich), Murmansk, Russia.
D V ProzorkevichPolar Branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography ("PINRO" Named After N.M. Knipovich), Murmansk, Russia.
T A ProkhorovaPolar Branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography ("PINRO" Named After N.M. Knipovich), Murmansk, Russia.
A A RusskikhPolar Branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography ("PINRO" Named After N.M. Knipovich), Murmansk, Russia.
N A StrelkovaPolar Branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography ("PINRO" Named After N.M. Knipovich), Murmansk, Russia.
A G TrofimovPolar Branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography ("PINRO" Named After N.M. Knipovich), Murmansk, Russia.
I P ProkopchukPolar Branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography ("PINRO" Named After N.M. Knipovich), Murmansk, Russia.
A A FilinPolar Branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography ("PINRO" Named After N.M. Knipovich), Murmansk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Arctic warms nearly four times faster than the global average, with maximum warming in the Barents Sea. Concurrently, changes in species distribution in this productive and highly exploited sub-Arctic hotspot has been found. However, studies so far have mostly focused on the effect of gradual warming on single species or trophic groups. We assess changes in zooplankton, fish and zoobenthos assemblages (130 species in 23 groups) and found heterogeneous response to ongoing warming. Temporally constrained cluster analysis showed that the warming was not continuous over the study period 2005-2022 but occurred in three phases: an initial period (2005-2011) cooler than the average for the whole study period, followed by a very warm period (2012-2016) and finally a cooler period again (2017-2022). The biotic response was greatest in the areas of largest oceanographic changes: in the northwest, the biomass of biota increased in most groups, including Arctic fish species, whereas in the southeast, the biomass of several fish species declined, while that of jellyfish and invasive snow crab increased. New knowledge is useful for generating scenarios for ecosystem responses to climate change.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemFishesGlobal WarmingAnimalsArctic RegionsBiomassOceans and SeasZooplanktonBiomassClimate changeEcosystem componentsRedistributionSub-ArcticWarming

Identifiers

PMID40234501
PMCPMC12000424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.