ArticleJournal of ultrasound2025
Ultrasound-guided tenotomy of the common extensor tendon in the elbow: a cadaveric investigation.
Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy technique for treating chronic tendinosis of the common extensor tendon (CET) in the elbow (lateral epicondylitis).
methodsThe study was conducted on 25 elbows from 13 cadavers without prior local injuries. Each CET tenotomy was performed using a Mikro 64 scalpel under ultrasound guidance to ensure precision and safety. Key anatomical structures, including the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), radial nerve, and posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve, were monitored to assess safety margins and detect potential complications.
resultsIn the 20 evaluated cases, the mean distance from the CET section to the radial epicondyle (DET) was 5.86 mm (range 5.96-12.8 mm), while the distance to the proximal LCL margin (DELCL) averaged 8.62 mm (range - 0.96-6.82 mm), yielding a confident tenotomy length of 2.76 mm. Partial LCL injury occurred in four cases without affecting joint stability, and no nerve injuries were observed. Incomplete CET sections were found in four cases, with residual fibers primarily along the medial and lateral margins.
conclusionThe ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy technique demonstrated safety and effectiveness in an anatomical setting. This minimally invasive approach may offer a viable surgical alternative for refractory lateral epicondylitis, minimizing the risk of complications and promoting a shorter recovery period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.