Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40234358›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025

Taming the In-Basket-How Two Simple Tools Reduced Portal Message Volume in an Academic Internal Medicine Clinic.

Nicole Hadeed, Jessica Ameling, James Henderson, Matthew Bucala, Yvette Salamey, Jennifer Meddings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Am I Keeping You from Something Important?Journal of general internal medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicole HadeedDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. nhadeed@med.umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9041-2644
Jessica AmelingDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
James HendersonDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Matthew BucalaDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Yvette SalameyDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jennifer MeddingsDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient portal messaging has emerged as a critical tool in primary care, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, facilitating asynchronous communication between patients and providers. The surge in portal messages during the pandemic has exacerbated work overload and burnout among primary care providers.

objectiveTo enhance primary care clinic portal message workflow efficiency by identifying barriers through surveys and interviews, then implementing interventions to address challenges and streamline processes.

designWe used a pre- and post-intervention with concurrent control design to evaluate this quality improvement project. The project was conducted at an Internal Medicine ambulatory clinic site within a large academic medical center in the Midwest.

participantsThe quality improvement project involved primary care physicians, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, medical assistants, and patient services associates managing patient portal messages in primary care clinics.

interventionInterviews and surveys assessed workflow practices, perceptions, and gaps. Interventions included developing "Best Practice Standards" and "Routing Guide" documents and restructuring staffing with dedicated time for message management. MAIN MEASURES: The co-primary outcomes were the volume of portal messages per physician clinical full-time equivalent (cFTE) and the proportion of message encounters with physician involvement. The secondary outcome was the proportion of messages sent to multiple recipients ("carbon copy" messages). KEY

resultsThe intervention site showed a 16% reduction in messages per physician cFTE monthly (RRR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.94) and a 65% decrease in "carbon copy" messages (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.31-0.39) compared to controls. Physician involvement in messages remained unchanged at the intervention site but increased 8% at control sites. Pre-intervention interviews identified workload, process, training, and stress barriers. Post-intervention, staff noted improvements from role clarification and dedicated message time.

conclusionTargeted interventions can reduce portal message burden and improve workflow efficiency in primary care by implementing standardized protocols and clarifying roles.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersCOVID-19Internal MedicinePatient PortalsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHumansPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementWorkflowIn-basket burdenPatient portal messagingPrimary careQuality improvementWorkflow efficiency

Identifiers

PMID40234358
PMCPMC12686222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.