ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Taming the In-Basket-How Two Simple Tools Reduced Portal Message Volume in an Academic Internal Medicine Clinic.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Am I Keeping You from Something Important?Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- A scoping review of studies on secure messaging through patient portals: persistent challenges and potential solutions.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Primary care physicians' experiences with inbox triage.JAMIA open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient portal messaging has emerged as a critical tool in primary care, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, facilitating asynchronous communication between patients and providers. The surge in portal messages during the pandemic has exacerbated work overload and burnout among primary care providers.
objectiveTo enhance primary care clinic portal message workflow efficiency by identifying barriers through surveys and interviews, then implementing interventions to address challenges and streamline processes.
designWe used a pre- and post-intervention with concurrent control design to evaluate this quality improvement project. The project was conducted at an Internal Medicine ambulatory clinic site within a large academic medical center in the Midwest.
participantsThe quality improvement project involved primary care physicians, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, medical assistants, and patient services associates managing patient portal messages in primary care clinics.
interventionInterviews and surveys assessed workflow practices, perceptions, and gaps. Interventions included developing "Best Practice Standards" and "Routing Guide" documents and restructuring staffing with dedicated time for message management. MAIN MEASURES: The co-primary outcomes were the volume of portal messages per physician clinical full-time equivalent (cFTE) and the proportion of message encounters with physician involvement. The secondary outcome was the proportion of messages sent to multiple recipients ("carbon copy" messages). KEY
resultsThe intervention site showed a 16% reduction in messages per physician cFTE monthly (RRR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.94) and a 65% decrease in "carbon copy" messages (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.31-0.39) compared to controls. Physician involvement in messages remained unchanged at the intervention site but increased 8% at control sites. Pre-intervention interviews identified workload, process, training, and stress barriers. Post-intervention, staff noted improvements from role clarification and dedicated message time.
conclusionTargeted interventions can reduce portal message burden and improve workflow efficiency in primary care by implementing standardized protocols and clarifying roles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.