ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025
Beyond Workarounds: Enhancing Education, Care, and Wellness on Inpatient Medicine Rotations -A Multicenter Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInpatient medicine rotations (IMRs) aim to deliver exceptional clinical education and high-quality patient care. However, increasing workloads and the fast pace of inpatient wards are undermining this dual objective.
objectiveTo explore tensions and challenges between balancing education and clinical practice on IMRs and how physician-leaders are addressing them.
designConstructivist grounded theory.
participantsInpatient medicine rotation physician-leaders from academic medical centers in the United States and Canada. APPROACH: Data collection involved semi-structured individual and group interviews, collected and analyzed iteratively to develop an explanatory conceptual model. Rigor was enhanced through constant comparison, investigator triangulation, and return-of-findings sessions. KEY
resultsTwenty interviews involving 27 participants from 20 distinct training programs were conducted. Participants endorsed IMRs unique clinical and educational value. However, they flagged how increasing workloads and resource challenges produce tensions that can undermine the quality of both which, as a consequence, negatively impact attending and trainee wellness. While reactionary "workarounds" were the norm, they often created unanticipated problems. Key IMR features and strategies for success were identified and organized into six categories: (1) patient mix/census; (2) leadership collaboration; (3) collaborative care models; (4) rotation scheduling; (5) clinical workflow; (6) educational workflow. How physician-leaders configured their IMR structures and processes within these categories had the potential to support or undermine the delivery of high-quality care, education, and wellness.
conclusionsInpatient medicine rotations, which is essential for clinical care and education, are currently facing serious challenges from a changing clinical and educational landscape. Our findings present a conceptual model highlighting key modifiable variables, giving physician-leaders a framework to assess and enhance their IMR's clinical learning environment, thus fostering quality care, education, and clinician wellness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.