ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2025
They Judge You By Your Incarceration: A Qualitative Study of Mistrust Among Formerly Incarcerated People Navigating Mental Health Care.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restructuring Crisis Response Programs as Civilian-Led: A Scoping Review.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Article
- Mental health treatment experiences before, during, and after incarceration: Perspectives of formerly incarcerated Black men.Psychological services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to explore the experiences of formerly incarcerated people navigating mental health care post-release and understand how mistrust of mental health services and providers is manifested among this population. Interviews were conducted between 2021 and 2022 with 25 people released from incarceration within the past five years. We partnered with community organizations to recruit a diverse sample of participants, using voluntary response and purposive sampling. The interview transcripts were coded using a modified grounded theory approach and the analysis further guided by critical phenomenology in order to center silenced or marginalized perspectives. Mistrust of mental health care was a prominent theme across interviews. Overall, participants felt that they did not have autonomy over their treatment planning and management. Participants described experiencing stigmatizing treatment from providers, suspicion of mandated mental health treatment, and believing that profit over patients was prioritized in the industry-all of which contributed to growing mistrust of the larger mental health system. The participants' experiences of losing control over their lives and treatment, compounded by a perceived complicity between mental health and carceral systems, shaped their mistrust toward mental health care. Nevertheless, many demonstrated remarkable persistence in seeking care and engaging with multiple providers, while also actively seeking to reclaim their autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40234348What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.