ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Comparison of Voice and Swallowing Changes After Thyroidectomy Using the Gasless Transaxillary, Transoral, and Conventional Transcervical Approaches: A Network Meta-analysis.
Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Longitudinal health-related quality of life after remote-access versus open thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Voice outcomes following robotic transoral, robotic retroauricular, and open hemithyroidectomy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Post-thyroidectomy anterior neck dysfunction: clinical phenotypes, mechanisms, and comprehensive management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated voice and swallowing outcomes following thyroidectomy by using the gasless transaxillary (GTAA) and transoral (TOA) approaches compared with the conventional transcervical approach (CTA).
methodsA comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted through September 2024. Network meta-analyses were performed on 14 comparative studies, encompassing 1723 patients.
resultsVoice handicap index (VHI)-10 scores, highest frequency, and frequency range deteriorated after surgery in all three methods. However, the postoperative voice outcomes of the GTAA and TOA were superior to the conventional approach at all follow-up points up to 3 months after the operation. Specifically, the VHI-10 scores of the GTAA and TOA were significantly lower than those of the CTA at 3 months postoperation. Other acoustic parameters, such as jitter, shimmer, noise-to-harmonic ratio, and intensity range, did not differ among the three methods. The postoperative swallowing impairment score (SIS)-6 of the GTAA and TOA were lower than that of the CTA. Specifically, the SIS-6 of the GTAA was significantly lower than those of the TOA and CTA at 3 months postoperation.
conclusionsThe postoperative voice and swallowing outcomes, especially VHI-10, highest frequency, frequency range, and SIS-6, following remote-access thyroidectomy using the GTAA and TOA were superior to those observed with the conventional approach. Given the limited number of studies included, further research is needed to confirm these findings as new studies emerge, especially those with larger sample sizes, diverse populations, different approaches, and extended follow-up periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40234337What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.