ReviewSkeletal radiology2025
Current and future role of CT and advanced CT applications in inflammatory arthritis in the clinic and trials.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Axial gout diagnosed by dual-energy CT in a young normouricaemic man with recurrent nephrolithiasis: a case-based review.Rheumatology international · 2026Review
- Review
- Imaging pathways in spondyloarthritis: integrating radiography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, low-dose computed tomography, and artificial intelligence methods : Radiology and AI in SpA.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) has traditionally been underutilized in the imaging of inflammatory arthritis due to its limitations in assessing soft tissue inflammation and concerns over radiation exposure. However, recent technological advancements have positioned CT as a more viable imaging modality for arthritis, offering high specificity and sensitivity in detecting structural bone changes. However, advances in ultra-low-dose CT protocols and AI-driven image reconstruction have significantly reduced radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic quality. Dynamic CT and spectral CT techniques, including dual-energy CT (DECT), have broadened CT's application in assessing dynamic joint instabilities and visualizing inflammatory changes through material-specific imaging. Techniques such as CT subtraction imaging and iodine mapping have enhanced the detection of active soft-tissue inflammation, virtual non-calcium reconstructions, and the detection of bone marrow edema. Possible CT applications span various forms of arthritis, including gout, calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD), psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis. Beyond its diagnostic capabilities, CT's ability to provide detailed structural assessment positions is a valuable tool for monitoring disease progression and therapeutic response, particularly in clinical trials. While MRI remains superior for soft tissue evaluation, CT's specificity for bone-related changes and its potential for integration into routine arthritis management warrant further exploration and research. This review explores the current and emerging roles of CT in arthritis diagnostics, with a focus on novel applications and future potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.