Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40234194›Full record

SynthesisBMJ mental health2025

Leveraging artificial intelligence in the prediction, diagnosis and treatment of depression and anxiety among perinatal women in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Uchechi Shirley Anaduaka, Ayomide Oluwaseyi Oladosu, Samantha Katsande, Clinton Sekyere Frempong, Success Awuku-Amador

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Uchechi Shirley AnaduakaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ayomide Oluwaseyi OladosuSchool of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong ayomideoladosu@ln.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-5144-1493
Samantha KatsandeAction on Preeclampsia Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Clinton Sekyere FrempongDepartment of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
Success Awuku-AmadorDigitalized for Jobs (D4J), GEA/GIZ, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) tools is gaining traction in maternal mental health (MMH) research. Despite its growing usage, little is known about its prospects and challenges in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to systematically review articles on the role of AI in addressing MMH in LMICs.

methodsThis systematic review adopts a patient and public involvement approach to investigate the role of AI in predicting, diagnosing or treating perinatal depression and anxiety (PDA) among perinatal women in LMICs. Seven databases were searched for studies that reported on AI tools/methods for PDA published between January 2010 and July 2024. Eligible studies were identified and extracted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using Covidence, and the data were synthesised using thematic analysis.

resultsOut of 2203 studies, 19 studies across eight countries were deemed eligible for extraction and synthesis. The review revealed that the supervised machine learning method was the most common AI approach and was used to improve the early detection of depression and anxiety among perinatal women. Additionally, postpartum depression was the most frequently investigated MMH condition in this study. Further, the review revealed only three conversational agents (CAs)/chatbots used to deliver psychological treatment.

conclusionsThe findings underscore the potential of AI-based methods in identifying risk factors and delivering psychological treatment for PDA. Future research should investigate the underlying mechanisms of the effectiveness of AI-based chatbots/CAs and assess the long-term effects for diagnosed mothers, to aid the improvement of MMH in LMICs. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024549455.

Indexed as

AnxietyArtificial IntelligenceDepressionDepression, PostpartumPregnancy ComplicationsDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansPregnancyAnxiety disordersDepressionDepression & mood disordersMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40234194
PMCPMC12001354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.