ArticleClinical lung cancer2025
Lung Carcinoid Tumors With Potentially Actionable Genomic Alterations and Responses to Targeted Therapies.
Article in Clinical lung cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Genomic Profiling of Sporadic Ampullary Somatostatin-producing D-cell Neuroendocrine Tumors Identifies Recurrent HRAS Hotspot Mutations.Endocrine pathology · 2026Article
- Clinical Responses to Tarlatamab Among Patients With Pulmonary Carcinoid.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2026Article
- European Society of Neuroendocrine Tumors (ENETS) 2025 guidance paper for lung and thymic carcinoids.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Article
- Pulmonary carcinoid harboring aRare tumors · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of molecular profiling in rare lung neuroendocrine neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEffective treatments for patients with advanced lung carcinoids remain limited. The prevalence of potentially actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) among lung carcinoids is not well-understood. MATERIALS AND
methodsLung carcinoids submitted for next-generation sequencing (NGS) at a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified genomics laboratory from September 2013 to March 2024 were retrospectively investigated to determine prevalence of AGAs. We evaluated outcomes with genotype-matched targeted therapies in patients with advanced lung carcinoids with AGAs identified across 3 institutions and comprehensive literature search.
resultsAmong 321 cases of lung carcinoids profiled by NGS, 8 (2.5%) harbored potential AGAs (4 [1.2%] with commercially available targeted therapies), including KRAS mutations (n = 4, 1.2%: G12C, G12D, G12R, G12V), ALK fusions (n = 2, 0.6%), BRAF D594N (n = 1, 0.3%), and RET fusion (n = 1, 0.3%). None of the 24 typical carcinoids harbored an AGA. Collectively across these database-identified patients, our multi-institutional cohort, and literature review, we identified 36 cases of lung carcinoids with potential AGAs (24 with commercially available targeted therapies), predominantly comprising fusions of ALK (n = 14), RET (n = 5), and NTRK (n = 2). Of 27 with known disease stage, 19 had stage 4 disease, and 13 (68.4%) had outcomes reported following targeted therapies. Median treatment duration was 12.0 months (95% CI: 6.7-16.0). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.6 months (95% CI: 6.7-16.0) across all targeted therapy lines and 14.0 months (95% CI: 1.3-NA) with first-line targeted therapies. Objective response rate with at least one targeted therapy was 61.5%.
conclusionsPatients with advanced lung carcinoids harboring AGAs can derive meaningful benefit from genotype-matched targeted therapies, highlighting potential role for NGS in patients with advanced carcinoids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.