Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40234106›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Integrating CORUM and co-fractionation mass spectrometry to create enhanced benchmarks for protein complex predictions.

Pengcheng Yang, Youngwoo Lee, Daniel B Szymanski, Jun Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Comparative multi "omics" profiling ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pengcheng YangDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, 150 N. University Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Youngwoo LeeDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, 915 Mitch Daniel Blvd., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Daniel B SzymanskiDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, 915 Mitch Daniel Blvd., West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Jun XieDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, 150 N. University Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) Plant Genome Research Project 1951819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-fractionation mass spectrometry (CFMS) enables the discovery of protein complexes and the systems-level analysis of multimer dynamics that facilitate responses to environmental and developmental conditions. A major challenge in CFMS data analysis, and omics approaches in general, is the development of reliable benchmarks for accurate evaluation of prediction methods. CORUM is commonly used as a source of benchmark complexes for protein complex composition predictions; however, its assumption of fully assembled subunit pools often conflicts with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and interaction predictions from CFMS experiments. To address this, we developed an integrative analysis method that leverages cross-kingdom evolutionary conservation among specific CORUM complexes and high-resolution SEC profile data from cell extracts. The resulting benchmark complexes are supported by statistical significance and consistent sizes between calculated and measured apparent masses. The approach was robust, revealing both conserved and species-specific complexes. Designed specifically for benchmark identification, this method can be applied to any species and used to evaluate protein complex predictions from other studies.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryMultiprotein ComplexesBenchmarkingChromatography, GelMultiprotein Complexesbenchmark protein complexesco-fractionation mass spectrometryprotein complex prediction

Identifiers

PMID40234106
PMCPMC11998666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.