ReviewPhysiologia plantarum
Epigenetic regulation and beyond in grapevine-pathogen interactions: a biotechnological perspective.
Review in Physiologia plantarum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Responding to Stress: Diversity and Resilience of Grapevine in a Changing Climate Under the Perspective of Omics Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Epigenetic regulation and beyond in grapevine-pathogen interactions: a biotechnological perspective.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As one of the most important crop plants worldwide, understanding the mechanisms underlying grapevine response to pathogen attacks is key to achieving a productive and sustainable viticulture. Recently, epigenetic regulation in plant immunity has gained significant traction in the scientific community, not only for its role in gene expression regulation but also for its heritability, giving it enormous biotechnological potential. Epigenetic marks have been shown to be dynamically modulated in key genomic regions upon infection, with some being maintained after such, being responsible for priming defense genes. In grapevine, however, knowledge of epigenetic mechanisms is still limited, especially regarding biotic stress responses, representing a glaring gap in knowledge in this important crop plant. Here, we report and integrate current knowledge on grapevine epigenetic regulation as well as non-epigenetic non-coding RNAs in the response to biotic stress. We also explore how epigenetic marks may be useful in grapevine breeding for resistance, considering different approaches, from uncovering and exploiting natural variation to inducing it through different means.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.