ArticleBMJ global health2025
Government purchase of private health services in the Eastern Mediterranean region: opportunities and challenges for stewarding towards a universal health coverage focus.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProliferation in government purchase of private healthcare requires stewardship support for impactful alignment to Universal Health Coverage (UHC) goals. This paper provides a synthesis of country purchasing initiatives involving the private sector from the Eastern Mediterranean region (EMR) identifying drivers, stewardship challenges and country aspirations for strengthening purchasing initiatives.
methodsFindings are drawn from 19 in-depth mixed methods country case studies commissioned by the WHO, guided by a standardised data collection tool for desk review and country stakeholder interviews. Case study synthesis approach was applied to draw on commonalities and emphasising important differences across country contexts. Extraction and analysis into country income groups allowed thematic comparisons.
resultsSignificant proliferation in the purchase of private healthcare has been driven by contextual opportunities provided by political momentum, local adaptive designs, unlocking of domestic financing and initial operational groundwork particularly in middle-income EMR countries. Common challenges include (1) steering constrained by conflicting ideologies, role dispersion and a focus on UHC schemes rather than the UHC vision; (2) implementation challenges of weak contract management expertise, uncertain quality compliance; and (3) private sector engagement hampered by insufficient communication and trust. Less resourced countries also face challenges of private sector fragmentation impeding purchasing. We found common interest across countries to better integrate the private sector for UHC. Prioritised future needs included (1) national Private Sector Engagement (PSE) planning to inform purchasing arrangements, (2) evidence for better understanding, (3) leadership structures, (4) formal dialogue platforms and (5) social-behavioural incentives for quality and data reporting compliance. Middle-income and high-income countries additionally prioritised payment controls, whereas lesser resourced countries emphasised sustainable fiscal mobilisation.
conclusionThe synthesis importantly highlights new directional and relational needs alongside traditional structural, and expertise needs to guide a re-imagined stewardship agenda for strengthening the purchase of private health services in the EMR. Future socio-behavioural research on private sector motivations for partnerships and behaviour under purchasing arrangements will be beneficial for stewarding PSE within local eco-systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.