Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40234056›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2025

Nutritional Status Predicts Functional Recovery and Adverse Outcomes in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Ludiane Alves do Nascimento, Marlon Juliano Romero Aliberti, Natalia Golin, Erika Suíter, Christian Valle Morinaga, Thiago Junqueira Avelino Silva, Pedro Kallas Curiati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ludiane Alves do NascimentoDepartment of Nutrition, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9870-7706
Marlon Juliano Romero AlibertiGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group (ProAGE), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Natalia GolinDepartment of Nutrition, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Erika SuíterDepartment of Nutrition, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Christian Valle MorinagaGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group (ProAGE), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Thiago Junqueira Avelino SilvaGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group (ProAGE), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro Kallas CuriatiGeriatric Emergency Department Research Group (ProAGE), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8544-1635

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN GERIATRIC MEDICINET32AG000212 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Alexander Keliimoeanu Smith · 1991 to 2026
$7.7M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the high prevalence of malnutrition in acutely ill older patients, nutritional status is rarely assessed in emergency departments (EDs), and the impact of nutritional risk screening on functional recovery is poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the association between nutritional parameters and a range of outcomes in older patients admitted through the ED.

methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted at tertiary hospital, enrolling patients aged 65 years or older between November 2021 and April 2022. We collected data on various patient parameters, including demographics, clinical factors (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI], National Early Warning Score 2), nutritional status (Nutritional Risk Screening 2002; Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria) and geriatric measures (Clinical Frailty Scale, Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living [ADL], Lawton and Brody Instrumental ADL, and PRO-AGE vulnerability tool). The primary outcome was functional recovery, and secondary outcomes included nosocomial infection, prolonged length of stay (LoS), in-hospital and postdischarge mortality, and hospital readmissions up to 6 months. Fine-Gray competing risks regression and multivariable logistic regressions were employed and adjusted for age, sex, education, CCI, functional status, LoS and initial allocation to intensive care.

resultsA total of 780 patients (mean age 80 ± 9 years, predominantly male) were included, with 32.2% identified as at nutritional risk and 22.1% diagnosed with malnutrition. Patients with no nutritional risk had a higher significantly functional recovery up to 6 months (79% vs. 66%, sub-HR = 1.28, 95%CI 1.04-1.57, p = 0.029), whereas nutritional risk was independently associated with in-hospital (13% vs. 2%, OR = 4.24, 95%CI 1.53-11.74, p = 0.005) and postdischarge (14% vs. 4%, OR = 2.76, 95%CI 1.17-6.49, p = 0.02) mortality. Finally, malnutrition was independently associated with nosocomial infection (12% vs. 2%, OR = 5.43, 95%CI 2.56-11.5, p < 0.001), prolonged LoS (56% vs. 22%, OR = 2.79, 95%CI 1.84-4.22, p < 0.001) and postdischarge mortality (13% vs. 4%, OR = 2.76, 95%CI 1.36-5.61, p = 0.005).

conclusionsNutritional parameters were significant predictors of functional recovery, nosocomial infection, prolonged LoS and mortality in older patients admitted through the ED. Early identification and interventions targeting nutritional deficiencies should be explored to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusRecovery of FunctionActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansLength of StayMaleMalnutritionProspective Studiesclinical outcomesemergency departmentGLIM criteriamalnutritionolder adults

Identifiers

PMID40234056
PMCPMC11999727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.