ArticleBMJ open2025
Impacts on quality of care following electronic health record implementation within a large Canadian community hospital: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "The emperor's new clothes": a qualitative study of end users' experiences from a failed large-scale implementation of an electronic health record system.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Outcomes of an Advanced Epic Personalization Course on Clinician Efficiency through Use of Electronic Medical Records: Retrospective Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to describe how healthcare providers perceived the impacts of implementing and using an electronic health record (EHR) on quality, safety and person-centredness of care.
designA qualitative descriptive design using semistructured interviews.
settingIn October 2020, a large Canadian community hospital implemented a new EHR system (Epic) across three sites, transitioning from a previously fragmented (combination of paper-based and electronic) system.
participantsSixty-two healthcare providers and clinical leaders.
resultsParticipants shared their experiences regarding the impact of EHR implementation on quality of care, which were analysed into common themes including task efficiency, information management, patient interactions and patient safety. While the system significantly altered their routines and introduced new responsibilities like additional documentation requirements, it also facilitated adherence to clinical guidelines, improved information visibility and enhanced documentation, benefiting overall quality of care and patient safety. Participants reported that EHR implementation led to increased efficiency, freeing up time for patient care and improving communication with patients and other providers.
conclusionEHRs have the potential to improve quality of care and patient safety, but this depends on their perceived value and how well healthcare providers can integrate their various features into clinical routines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.