Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40233954›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2025

Pain management training for people with persistent pain and their informal carers (JOINT SUPPORT): multicentre randomised controlled feasibility trial with embedded qualitative study in English musculoskeletal services.

Toby Smith, Reema Khoury, Allie Welsh, Coralie Crowther, Sarah Hanson, Kelly Grant, Allan B Clark, Polly-Anna Ashford, Matthew Hammond, Martin Pond and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Toby SmithUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, UK toby.o.smith@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1673-2954
Reema KhouryNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Allie WelshLeeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Coralie CrowtherNorfolk and Waveney ICS, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Sarah HansonSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4751-8248
Kelly GrantNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Allan B ClarkNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Polly-Anna AshfordNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Matthew HammondNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Martin PondNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Emma DuresNursing and Midwifery, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-8607
Jo AdamsSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1765-7060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the feasibility of conducting a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) to test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a pain management training intervention to support people with persistent musculoskeletal pain and their informal carers.

designTwo-arm, multicentre, pragmatic, open, feasibility RCT with embedded qualitative study.

settingNational Health Service (NHS) providers in four English hospitals.

participantsAdults receiving NHS care for persistent musculoskeletal pain and their informal carers.

interventionControl: usual NHS care. EXPERIMENTAL: usual NHS care plus a carer-patient pain management training intervention (JOINT SUPPORT), comprising five, 1-hour, group-based sessions for patients and carers, delivered by trained physiotherapists or occupational therapists. Content included understanding pain, pacing, graded activity, fear avoidance, goal-setting, understanding the benefits of physical activity and medication management. This was re-enforced with a workbook. After the group-based sessions, patients and carers were supported through three telephone sessions. RANDOMISATION: Central randomisation was computer-generated (2:1 Experimental:Control), stratified by hospital and patient-participant age (≤65 years). There was no blinding.

main outcome measuresData collected at baseline and 3 months post-randomisation included screening logs, intervention logs, fidelity checklists and clinical outcomes on quality of life, physical and emotional outcomes, adverse events and resource use. Interviews with 14 patient-carer participants and six health professionals who delivered the intervention.

resultsA total of 76 participants (38 patients; 38 carers) were enrolled. Sixty per cent (312/480) of patients screened were eligible with 12% consenting to be randomised (38/312). Fifty-four per cent (13/24) of the experimental group reached minimal compliance with the JOINT SUPPORT intervention. There was no evidence of treatment contamination. For patient-participant outcomes, within-group differences from baseline to 3 months favoured the control group when assessed by EQ-5D and Generalised Self-Efficacy total score, but favoured the intervention group when assessed by numerical rating scale pain, fatigue and Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scaletotal score. Qualitative data demonstrated the acceptability of the trial design and JOINT SUPPORT intervention with modifications to improve trial processes.

conclusionsThe JOINT SUPPORT intervention was acceptable to patient-carer dyads and health professionals. Modifications to trial design, particularly enhanced recruitment strategies, are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN78169443. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (TS) on reasonable request. This includes access to the full protocol, anonymised participant-level dataset and statistical code.

Indexed as

CaregiversMusculoskeletal PainPain ManagementAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeState MedicineCaregiversPAIN MANAGEMENTQUALITATIVE RESEARCHRandomised Controlled TrialREHABILITATION MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID40233954
PMCPMC12001371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.