ArticleBMJ open2025
Phase I safety and tolerability dose escalation study of microencapsulated hepatocyte intraperitoneal transplantation therapy in adult patients with liver failure: a study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05727722 (A Phase I Safety and Tolerability Dose Escalation Study of Micro-encapsulated Hepatocytes Intraperitoneal Transplantation Therapy for Adult Liver Failure Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I Safety and Tolerability Dose Escalation Study of Micro-encapsulated Hepatocytes Intraperitoneal Transplantation Therapy for Adult Liver Failure Patients.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing a Clinically Practical Biomaterial Platform for Endogenous Liver Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChina has a high prevalence of liver diseases, with about 300 million patients suffering from various types of liver diseases, where the incidence of severe liver diseases is 1%-3%. More than half a million people die from end-stage liver disease every year in China. In situ liver transplantation is the most effective treatment for liver failure, but only a limited number of patients undergo liver transplantation due to the shortage of donors. Hepatocyte transplantation requires only a certain number of hepatocytes rather than the whole liver, regardless of complex issues such as in vitro reconstruction of the three-dimensional structure of the liver, blood vessels and biliary ducts, enabling it to be safer and easier to promote in clinical practice than liver transplantation. This study aims to evaluate the safety and tolerability of microencapsulated hepatocyte intraperitoneal transplantation therapy in adult patients with liver failure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a single-centre, unblinded, single-arm study comprising a dose escalation phase and a preliminary assessment of efficacy. Subjects who were diagnosed with liver failure (including chronic liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure), who received 3 days of regular treatment with no beneficial effect and who volunteered to participate in microencapsulated hepatocyte intraperitoneal transplantation therapy will be enrolled. To minimise the number of patients receiving an unbeneficial therapeutic dosage, the accelerated titration design and '3+3' design will be used jointly for the dosage escalation method. All patients with microencapsulated hepatocyte transplantation will be monitored on the 1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, 28th, 60th and 90th days after the treatment for safety and primary efficacy analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital Ethics Committee. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05727722.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.