Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40233952›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

A Prospective double-blind, randomised controlled trial comparing angiotensin II to norepinephrine to reduce length of hospital stay in cardiac surgery patients (the PORTHOS study protocol).

Tim G Coulson, Eldho Paul, Lachlan F Miles, David Pilcher, Silvana F Marasco, Daniel Frei, Rinaldo Bellomo

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tim G CoulsonDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia timcoulson@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6182-268X
Eldho PaulAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lachlan F MilesCentre for Integrated Critical Care, The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2044-5560
David PilcherAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Silvana F MarascoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel FreiWellington Regional Hospital, Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand.
Rinaldo BellomoDepartment of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac surgery is frequently associated with vasoplegia and vasopressor treatment. Both may be associated with postoperative complications and prolonged length of stay. The most frequently used vasopressor is norepinephrine. However, in a pilot, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in cardiac surgery patients, angiotensin II was effective in maintaining blood pressure and was associated with a shorter duration of hospital stay than norepinephrine. Furthermore, hyperreninaemic patients were more sensitive to angiotensin II. These findings support the need for a larger RCT to determine whether angiotensin II is superior to norepinephrine as a first-line treatment for low blood pressure after cardiac surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a double-blind RCT comparing an infusion of either angiotensin II or norepinephrine intraoperatively and for up to 48 hours after the start of surgery. We will randomly allocate 400 cardiac surgery patients at multiple centres in two countries to either an equipotent angiotensin II or norepinephrine infusion, titrated to a mean arterial pressure of 70-80 mm Hg. The primary outcome will be length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes will include a composite of renal, cardiovascular and neurological events. A subgroup analysis of patients with elevated baseline renin levels will be undertaken. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the Alfred Human Research Ethics Committee on 14 July 2023 (HREC/97814/Alfred-2023). Results will be published on completion of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12623000848606.

Indexed as

Angiotensin IICardiac Surgical ProceduresLength of StayNorepinephrinePostoperative ComplicationsVasoconstrictor AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAngiotensin IINorepinephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsAdult intensive & critical careANAESTHETICSCardiac surgery

Identifiers

PMID40233952
PMCPMC12004499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.