Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40233941›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2025

A right frontal network for analogical and deductive reasoning.

Joseph Mole, James K Ruffle, Amy Nelson, Edgar Chan, Tim Shallice, Parashkev Nachev, Lisa Cipolotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Complex functions of human lateral frontopolar cortex.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joseph MoleDepartment of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0092-1128
James K RuffleInstitute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6248-7203
Amy NelsonInstitute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Edgar ChanDepartment of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Tim ShalliceInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AZ, UK.
Parashkev NachevInstitute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2718-4423
Lisa CipolottiDepartment of Neuropsychology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

Funding

Department of Health's National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre'sGuarantors of Brain and the Medical Research Council MR/X00046X/1National Brain AppealWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 089231/A/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two of the most well-studied types of reasoning are analogical reasoning (AR) and deductive reasoning (DR). Yet, our understanding of the relationship between reasoning abilities and their neuroanatomical basis remains surprisingly limited. We aimed to conduct fine-grained anatomical mapping of performance on tests of AR, DR and fluid intelligence (Gf), in a large sample of patients with unilateral focal frontal or posterior lesions and healthy controls. We assessed 247 prospectively recruited patients using two new tests: the Analogical Reasoning Test (ART) and the Deductive Reasoning Test (DRT); and the best-established measure of Gf: Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (RAPM). Non-parametric Bayesian stochastic block modelling was used to reveal the community structure of lesion deficit networks, disentangling functional from confounding pathological distributed effects. ART and DRT performance was significantly impaired in patients with frontal lesions [ART: F(2,238) = 18.93; P < 0.001; Frontal group worse than Posterior group and healthy controls, both P < 0.001; DRT: F(2,387) = 18.491; P < 0.001; Frontal group worse than healthy controls, P < 0.01]. Right frontal effects were evident on both tests. Thus, on the ART, right frontal patients were more impaired than left (P < 0.05). On the DRT, right frontal patients were more impaired than left frontal patients on questions with indeterminate solutions (P < 0.05) but not on questions with determinate ones. Non-parametric Bayesian stochastic block modelling implicated a right frontal network in ART and DRT performance. Strikingly, we found that this network was also implicated in performance on RAPM. Our study represents the most robust investigation of AR and DR in the focally injured brain. Our findings imply that a right frontal network is critical. The ART and DRT appear to be promising new clinical tests, capable of evaluating reasoning abilities and identifying right frontal lobe dysfunction.

Indexed as

Frontal LobeNerve NetThinkingAdultAgedBayes TheoremBrain MappingFemaleHumansIntelligenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsProspective Studiesexecutive functionsfrontal lobesintelligencenetwork lesion-symptom mappingreasoning

Identifiers

PMID40233941
PMCPMC12073978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.