Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40233823›Full record

ArticleMethods of information in medicine2024

Large-Scale Integration of DICOM Metadata into HL7-FHIR for Medical Research.

Alexa Iancu, Johannes Bauer, Matthias S May, Hans-Ulrich Prokosch, Arnd Dörfler, Michael Uder, Lorenz A Kapsner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods of information in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AI-driven multimodal retinal imaging for early detection and risk stratification of vascular and neurodegenerative diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. The evolving role of DICOM in digital pathology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexa IancuFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Medical Informatics, Erlangen, Germany.
Johannes BauerMedical Center for Information and Communication Technology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Matthias S MayInstitute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich ProkoschFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Medical Informatics, Erlangen, Germany.
Arnd DörflerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Michael UderInstitute of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany.
Lorenz A KapsnerFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Medical Informatics, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the Medical Informatics Initiative (MIRACUM Consortium) FUNDING NUMBER FKZ: 01ZZ1801A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current gap between the availability of routine imaging data and its provisioning for medical research hinders the utilization of radiological information for secondary purposes. To address this, the German Medical Informatics Initiative (MII) has established frameworks for harmonizing and integrating clinical data across institutions, including the integration of imaging data into research repositories, which can be expanded to routine imaging data.

objectivesThis project aims to address this gap by developing a large-scale data processing pipeline to extract, convert, and pseudonymize DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) metadata into "ImagingStudy" Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) and integrate them into research repositories for secondary use.

methodsThe data processing pipeline was developed, implemented, and tested at the Data Integration Center of the University Hospital Erlangen. It leverages existing open-source solutions and integrates seamlessly into the hospital's research IT infrastructure. The pipeline automates the extraction, conversion, and pseudonymization processes, ensuring compliance with both local and MII data protection standards. A large-scale evaluation was conducted using the imaging studies acquired by two departments at University Hospital Erlangen within 1 year. Attributes such as modality, examined body region, laterality, and the number of series and instances were analyzed to assess the quality and availability of the metadata.

resultsOnce established, the pipeline processed a substantial dataset comprising over 150,000 DICOM studies within an operational period of 26 days. Data analysis revealed significant heterogeneity and incompleteness in certain attributes, particularly the DICOM tag "Body Part Examined." Despite these challenges, the pipeline successfully generated valid and standardized FHIR, providing a robust basis for future research.

conclusionWe demonstrated the setup and test of a large-scale end-to-end data processing pipeline that transforms DICOM imaging metadata directly from clinical routine into the Health Level 7-FHIR format, pseudonymizes the resources, and stores them in an FHIR server. We showcased that the derived FHIRs offer numerous research opportunities, for example, feasibility assessments within Bavarian and Germany-wide research infrastructures. Insights from this study highlight the need to extend the "ImagingStudy" FHIR with additional attributes and refine their use within the German MII.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHealth Information InteroperabilityHealth Level SevenMetadataRadiology Information SystemsDiagnostic ImagingGermanyHumansSystems Integration

Identifiers

PMID40233823
PMCPMC12133321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.