ArticleOcular immunology and inflammation2025
Effectiveness of Frequently Used TNF Inhibitors vs. Conventional Immunosuppressive Therapies for Noninfectious Uveitis.
Article in Ocular immunology and inflammation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic network analysis links uveitis with systemic inflammatory diseases.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the corticosteroid sparing efficacy of frequently used antimetabolites to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in the management of noninfectious ocular inflammation.
methodsRetrospective analysis of patients with noninfectious uveitis on conventional antimetabolite (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine,or leflunomide, "CONV") or a TNF inhibitor (adalimumab or infliximab, "TNFi") with active inflammation or more than 7.5 mg daily prednisone. Eyes were assessed in three groups: CONV only, TNFi only and combination of both (COMB). Cox regression models compared treatment success, adjusted for age, race, smoking, anatomic location of uveitis, duration of uveitis and visual acuity. Corticosteroid sparing success was defined as: inactive or slightly active uveitis on <=7.5 mg daily oral prednisone and <=2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1%.
resultsThere were 1475 eligible patients in the analysis. By 6 and 12 months, respectively, the Cox model-predicted, percentage success was 27.6% and 44.9% for the CONV group; 34.2% and 53.9% in the TNFi group and 39.9% and 61.1% for the COMB group. COMB was more likely than CONV to achieve success (adjusted HR 1.58 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28, 1.95,
conclusionOur results suggest COMB is more effective than CONV at achieving disease quiescence and corticosteroid sparing success among patients with active noninfectious uveitis. More research is needed to determine if TNFi alone is superior to CONV for uveitic corticosteroid-sparing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.