ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025
Impact of prognostic scores on acute kidney injury assessment in the postoperative period of myocardial revascularization.
Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the impact of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in assessing the severity of acute kidney injury in patients after cardiopulmonary bypass.
methodA retrospective cohort study with a non-probabilistic sample. Inferential analysis was performed using Pearson's chi-square, Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests, with a significance level of 5%.
resultsThe prevalence of acute kidney injury was 31.4%. The Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment showed higher scores in patients with kidney injury (58 (48-64) versus 48 (37-57), p = 0.02; 7 (6-9) versus 6 (5-7), p = 0.003), in addition to a longer stay in intensive care, 8 (6-16) versus 6 (5-8) (p = 0.02) days, respectively.
conclusionPatients with acute kidney injury remained in intensive care longer, and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment showed good performance, evidencing greater severity among patients with acute kidney injury in the postoperative period of coronary artery bypass grafting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.