ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2025
The laminar pattern of proprioceptive activation in human primary motor cortex.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes From Use of the Fédération International de Football Association (FIFA) 11⁺ Program With and Without Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in 60 Male High School Soccer Players.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Trial
- Bridging the gap with invasive imaging: promises and challenges of a new generation of ultrahigh resolution fMRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Limb state accounts for differences between motor imagery and action in motor cortex.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Impact of thermal and physiological denoising on laminar functional connectivity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The primary motor cortex (M1) is increasingly being recognized for its vital role in proprioceptive somatosensation. However, our current understanding of proprioceptive processing at the laminar scale is limited. Empirical findings in primates and rodents suggest a pronounced role of superficial cortical layers, but the involvement of deep layers has yet to be examined in humans. Submillimeter resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has emerged in recent years, paving the way for studying layer-dependent activity in humans (laminar fMRI). In the present study, laminar fMRI was employed to investigate the influence of proprioceptive somatosensation on M1 deep layer activation using passive finger movements. Significant M1 deep layer activation was observed in response to proprioceptive stimulation across 10 healthy subjects using a vascular space occupancy (VASO)-sequence at 7 T. For further validation, two additional datasets were included which were obtained using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence with ultrahigh (0.3 mm) in-plane resolution, yielding converging results. These results were interpreted in the light of previous laminar fMRI studies and the active inference account of motor control. We propose that a considerable proportion of M1 deep layer activation is due to proprioceptive influence and that deep layers of M1 constitute a key component in proprioceptive circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.