Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40233153›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2025

The laminar pattern of proprioceptive activation in human primary motor cortex.

Lasse Knudsen, Fanhua Guo, Daniel Sharoh, Jiepin Huang, Jakob U Blicher, Torben E Lund, Yan Zhou, Peng Zhang, Yan Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Limb state accounts for differences between motor imagery and action in motor cortex.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lasse KnudsenState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-4209
Fanhua GuoState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
Daniel SharohDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Trigon 204, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Jiepin HuangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
Jakob U BlicherCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Universitetsbyen 3, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.
Torben E LundCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Universitetsbyen 3, Aarhus, 8000, Denmark.
Yan ZhouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Air Force Medical Center, PLA, 30 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
Peng ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9603-8454
Yan YangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No 15 Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation Z210009National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFB4700101National Natural Science Foundation of China 31930053Sino-Danish Center (SDC)STI2030-Major Projects 2021ZD0204200Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences XDB37030303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary motor cortex (M1) is increasingly being recognized for its vital role in proprioceptive somatosensation. However, our current understanding of proprioceptive processing at the laminar scale is limited. Empirical findings in primates and rodents suggest a pronounced role of superficial cortical layers, but the involvement of deep layers has yet to be examined in humans. Submillimeter resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has emerged in recent years, paving the way for studying layer-dependent activity in humans (laminar fMRI). In the present study, laminar fMRI was employed to investigate the influence of proprioceptive somatosensation on M1 deep layer activation using passive finger movements. Significant M1 deep layer activation was observed in response to proprioceptive stimulation across 10 healthy subjects using a vascular space occupancy (VASO)-sequence at 7 T. For further validation, two additional datasets were included which were obtained using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence with ultrahigh (0.3 mm) in-plane resolution, yielding converging results. These results were interpreted in the light of previous laminar fMRI studies and the active inference account of motor control. We propose that a considerable proportion of M1 deep layer activation is due to proprioceptive influence and that deep layers of M1 constitute a key component in proprioceptive circuits.

Indexed as

Motor CortexProprioceptionAdultBrain MappingFemaleFingersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMovementYoung Adultbalanced-SSFPcortical layerslaminar fMRIprimary motor cortexVASO

Identifiers

PMID40233153
PMCPMC11998912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.