Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40233122›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A multidimensional quiet quitting scale: Development and test of a measure of quiet quitting.

Pankaj C Patel, Maria João Guedes, Daniel G Bachrach, Younsung Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pankaj C PatelDepartment of Management and Operations, Villanova School of Business, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4934-8166
Maria João GuedesDepartment of Management, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4342-2620
Daniel G BachrachDepartment of Management, Culverhouse College of Business, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States of America.
Younsung ChoDepartment of Management, Culverhouse College of Business, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7696-6870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing attention has focused on employees' repeated workplace decision to engage in work-related tasks and responsibilities at a minimum level that will not lead to their dismissal. This pattern of employee work behavior, labeled "Quiet Quitting," represents a potentially problematic organizational phenomenon, particularly given increasingly complex work demands that can lower organizational performance. However, the literature lacks both a conceptually anchored definition of the Quiet Quitting construct and an associated empirically validated measure. Through four studies (sample of graduate students, Prolific sample, snowball sample from participants around the world, and a field sample of employees), we develop and validate a two-dimensional Quiet Quitting scale. This scale will facilitate measurement of the construct and development of a more nuanced understanding of its nomological network, correlates, and consequences. Implications for theory and research bearing on employee Quiet Quitting and employee work contributions are offered.

Indexed as

WorkplaceAdultEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40233122
PMCPMC11999150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.