Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40233115›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

Germline mutation rates and fine-scale recombination parameters in zebra finch.

Djivan Prentout, Daria Bykova, Carla Hoge, Daniel M Hooper, Callum S McDiarmid, Felix Wu, Simon C Griffith, Marc de Manuel, Molly Przeworski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Why recombination hotspots?PLoS genetics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Djivan PrentoutDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3088-3954
Daria BykovaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Carla HogeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9798-9684
Daniel M HooperInstitute for Comparative Genomics and Richard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States of America.
Callum S McDiarmidSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Felix WuDepartment of Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0155-9071
Simon C GriffithSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Marc de ManuelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Molly PrzeworskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5369-9009

Funding

Recombination rate variation and evolution in vertebratesR01GM083098 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PRZEWORSKI, MOLLY F · 2007 to 2024
$4.6M
Mechanisms of mutation and recombination and their evolution in vertebratesR35GM153355 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI MOLLY F PRZEWORSKI · 2024 to 2026
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083098NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM153355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of our understanding of the fundamental processes of mutation and recombination stems from a handful of disparate model organisms and pedigree studies of mammals, with little known about other vertebrates. To gain a broader comparative perspective, we focused on the zebra finch (Taeniopygia castanotis), which, like other birds, differs from mammals in its karyotype (which includes many micro-chromosomes), in the mechanism by which recombination is directed to the genome, and in aspects of ontogenesis. We collected genome sequences from three generation pedigrees that provide information about 80 meioses, inferring 202 single-point de novo mutations, 1,088 crossovers, and 275 non-crossovers. On that basis, we estimated a sex-averaged mutation rate of 5.0 × 10-9 per base pair per generation, on par with mammals that have a similar generation time (~2-3 years). Also as in mammals, we found a paternal germline mutation bias at later stages of gametogenesis (of 1.7:1) but no discernible difference between sexes in early development. Examining recombination patterns, we found that the sex-averaged crossover rate on macro-chromosomes is 0.93 cM/Mb, with a pronounced enrichment of crossovers near telomeres. In contrast, non-crossover rates are more uniformly distributed. On micro-chromosomes, sex-averaged crossover rates are substantially higher (3.96 cM/Mb), in accordance with crossover homeostasis, and both crossover and non-crossover events are more uniformly distributed. At a finer scale, recombination events overlap CpG islands more often than expected by chance, as expected in the absence of PRDM9. Estimates of the degree of GC-biased gene conversion (59%), the mean non-crossover conversion tract length (~32 bp), and the non-crossover-to-crossover ratio (5.4:1) are all comparable to those reported in primates and mice. Therefore, properties of germline mutation and recombination resolutions remain similar over large phylogenetic distances.

Indexed as

FinchesGerm-Line MutationMutation RateRecombination, GeneticAnimalsCrossing Over, GeneticFemaleGenomeMalePedigree

Identifiers

PMID40233115
PMCPMC12047795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.