ArticlePloS one2025
Application of alternative nonlinear models to predict growth curve in partridges.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phenotypic Responses to Selection in Ross 308 Broiler Breeders: Long-Term Growth Assessed With Nonlinear Models Across Four Generations.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to describe the growth pattern in partridges using nonlinear models. Eight nonlinear mathematical functions (Bridges, Janoschek, Richards, Schumacher, Morgan, Lomolino, Sinusoidal, and Weibull) were used. The parameters of nonlinear models were estimated by fitting the models to partridge body weight records using the NLIN and MODEL procedures in the SAS program. Model performance was assessed and model behavior was examined during the process of fitting nonlinear regression curves. The overall goodness of fit of each model to various data profiles was assessed using the adjusted coefficient of determination, root mean square error, Akaike's information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion. The adjusted coefficient of determination values for each model are generally high, indicating that the models fit the data well overall. Based on goodness of fit criteria, the Morgan model was found to be the most appropriate function for fitting the growth curve of male and female partridges. Furthermore, the Lomolino model had the worst fit to the growth curves of male and female partridges. While the predictions of the final body weight from all the models were good, the Morgan function outperformed the others in this regard. Based on the first derivative of the Morgan model, the absolute growth rates for male and female partridges as a function of time revealed that these values gradually increased with increasing age until 42 and 35 days of age, respectively, and then declined. The Morgan function is a useful replacement for conventional growth functions when describing the growth curves of different partridge breeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.