ArticlePloS one2025
'Great in theory': Women's care experiences in relation to Australia's national maternity Strategy-Qualitative survey responses.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe provision of woman-centred maternity care in Australia is guided by a national Strategy released in November 2019 titled Woman-centred care: Strategic directions for Australian maternity services (the Strategy). The Strategy upholds four values (safety, respect, choice, and access) that underpin twelve principles of woman-centred care.
aimTo examine the maternity care experiences of women in Australia and explore how these align with the stated values and principles of the Strategy.
methodsA national online survey was undertaken between February and June 2023. Women who received all their maternity care in Australia since 1 January 2020 were invited to participate. The survey consisted of predominantly closed questions; however, six open-text questions were included to give participants the opportunity to provide in-depth responses about the Strategy and its values. This paper presents a qualitative content analysis of the free-text responses.
findingsA completed survey was submitted by 1750 eligible participants, of whom 1667 provided 3562 qualitative responses included in this analysis. These showed that while the definition of safety provided in the Strategy favours physically safe care, the survey participants preferred a definition that was more holistic, providing for emotional and psychological safety. Participants expressed the need for respectful relationships with their maternity care providers where they felt listened to and heard. They wanted to be made aware of their choices and to have their maternity care decisions supported without coercion. Participants also desired access to continuity of care, particularly with midwives, and greater access to mental health support across the maternity care episode.
conclusionThe intent of the national Strategy has not yet been fully realised. A nationally coordinated response is required if the Strategy is to move from policy to practice, ensuring that women in Australia receive true woman-centred maternity care as intended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.