ArticlePLoS medicine2025
Genome-wide nucleosome footprints of plasma cfDNA predict preterm birth: A case-control study.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-trimester non-invasive prediction of preterm birth using cell-free DNA fragmentomics.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- First-trimester preeclampsia prediction model via integrative machine learning of maternal risk profiles and laboratory markers.Genes & diseases · 2026Article
- Reappraising the topology of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal blood toward improved prenatal genetic diagnostics.Science advances · 2026Review
- Excessively High Maternal Total Cell-Free DNA Concentration and Fetal Growth Restriction in Singleton Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting of early miscarriage based on machine learning: a retrospective cohort study in China.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for preterm birth in women concurrent with Hepatitis B virus carrier status and gestational diabetes mellitus.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Cell-free DNA in female infertility: from pathological mechanisms to clinical biomarkers.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Advances in cfDNA research for pregnancy-related diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Blood-based predictive biomarkers for preterm birth: Redefining risk stratification in modern perinatal care.Tzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreterm birth (PTB) occurs in approximately 11% of all births worldwide, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality for both mothers and their offspring. Identifying pregnancies at risk of preterm birth during early pregnancy may help improve interventions and reduce its incidence. Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA), derived from placenta and other maternal tissues, serves as a dynamic indicator of biological processes and pathological changes in pregnancy. These properties establish cfDNA as a valuable biomarker for investigating pregnancy complications, including PTB. METHODS AND
findingsTo date, there are few methods available for PTB prediction that have been developed with large sample sizes, high-throughput screening, and validated in independent cohorts. To address this gap, we established a large-scale, multi-center case-control study involving 2,590 pregnancies (2,072 full-term and 518 preterm) from three independent hospitals to develop a spontaneous preterm birth classifier. We performed whole-genome sequencing on cfDNA, focusing on promoter profiling (read depth of promoter regions spanning from -1 to +1 kb around transcriptional start sites). Using four machine learning models and two feature selection algorithms, we developed classifiers for predicting preterm birth. Among these, the classifier based on the support vector machine model, named PTerm (Promoter profiling classifier for preterm prediction), exhibited the highest area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.878 (0.852-0.904) following leave-one-out cross-validation. Additionally, PTerm exhibited strong performance in three independent validation cohorts, achieving an overall AUC of 0.849 (0.831-0.866).
conclusionsIn summary, PTerm demonstrated high accuracy in predicting preterm birth. Additionally, it can be utilized with current non-invasive prenatal test data without changing its procedures or increasing detection cost, making it easily adaptable for preclinical tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.