ArticlePloS one2025
Implementation of adolescent HIV screening in two urban pediatric emergency departments in the United States.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesRoutine, opt-out HIV screening of adolescents and youth (AY) is recommended in the United States in all healthcare settings, including emergency departments (EDs), however, data on ED-based HIV screening among AY remains limited. We aimed to describe the implementation and outcomes of a routine HIV AY screening program in two pediatric EDs in Washington, DC.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional prospective study of an opt-out HIV point-of-care testing (POCT) program of AY aged 13-24 years at a tertiary-based pediatric ED and community-based pediatric ED in Washington DC from March 2009 to February 2019. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze annual program performance by numbers of eligible AY seen, approached, tested, and new HIV identified. One-time ED staff survey collected barriers to HIV screening.
resultsDuring the 10-year period, out of 191,107 AY seen in ED, 21.9% (n=41,913) were approached for HIV POCT, of which 58.7% were tested (n=24,599); 23 new HIV infections (0.09% of tested AY) were identified. A higher proportion of AY were approached at the community-based ED compared to the tertiary-based ED (58.5% vs. 11.4%). The tertiary-based ED experienced a decline in AY approached after shifting the task from designated testers to ED staff. Among 179 surveyed ED staff, the most common barriers to HIV POCT included forgetting to offer the test (41.9%), lack of time (33.0%) and discomfort when approaching parents/guardians (15.6%).
conclusionsThe rate of new HIV diagnoses among screened AY ED patients was <0.1%, however, less than one-quarter of eligible AY were approached for testing. The staff-run HIV POCT model was successful in the lower acuity community-based pediatric ED, while the larger tertiary-based pediatric ED performed well only with the support of dedicated testers. Future studies are necessary to identify the optimal implementation strategy for sustainable ED-based AY HIV screening in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.