Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40233054›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Assessing the feasibility of large language models to identify top research priorities in enhanced external counterpulsation.

Shengkun Gai, Fangwan Huang, Xuanyun Liu, Ryan G Benton, Glen M Borchert, Jingshan Huang, Xiuyu Leng

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shengkun GaiDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Fangwan HuangCollege of Computer and Data Science, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
Xuanyun LiuCollege of Computer and Data Science, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
Ryan G BentonSchool of Computing, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States of America.
Glen M BorchertCollege of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States of America.
Jingshan HuangSchool of Computing and College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, United States of America.
Xiuyu LengDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0005-7885-852X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP), as a non-invasive, cost-effective, and efficient adjunctive circulatory technique, has been widely applied in in the cardiovascular field. Numerous studies and clinical observations have confirmed the obvious advantages of EECP in promoting blood flow perfusion to vital organs such as the heart, brain, and kidneys. However, many potential mechanisms of EECP remain insufficiently validated, necessitating researchers to dedicate substantial time and effort to in-depth investigations. In this work, large language models (such as ChatGPT and Ernie Bot) were used to identify top research priorities in five key topics in the field of EECP: mechanisms, device improvements, cardiovascular applications, neurological applications, and other applications. After generating specific research priorities in each domain through language models, a panel of nine experienced EECP experts was invited to independently evaluate and score them based on four parameters: relevance, originality, clarity, and specificity. Notably, high average and median scores for these evaluation parameters were obtained, indicating a strong endorsement from experts in the EECP field. This study preliminarily suggests that large language models like ChatGPT and Ernie Bot could serve as powerful tools for identifying and prioritizing research priorities in the EECP domain.

Indexed as

CounterpulsationResearchFeasibility StudiesHumansLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID40233054
PMCPMC11999140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.