ArticlePloS one2025
Informal workers' perceptions of retirement planning in developing countries.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we examine the perceptions of informal workers toward retirement planning in developing countries. Specifically, we examine vegetable market vendors' perceptions of the local superannuation fund, namely the Fiji National Provident Fund (FNPF) in the Western division of Fiji, where agriculture is predominant. The research aims to address the gap in the literature concerning nest egg savings options for the part of the population for whom superannuation contributions are not mandatory. Nest eggs savings are savings and investments for huge financial goals such as retirement. Generally, respondents had a positive outlook on the FNPF, and most responded that they would prefer a tailor-made retirement plan suited to the income and livelihood of market vendors. Specifically, as self-employed people, market vendors are keen for a specialized system of voluntary contributions towards their FNPF accounts that bypasses the mandatory joint-contributions from employers. We also find that age, gender, duration as a market vendor, and other savings avenues are vital for accessibility to financial services offered by the FNPF. We also find that while market vendors are aware of saving and saving benefits with FNPF, there is a lack of intention for them to adopt the current FNPF product. Policymakers must, therefore, develop FNPF products to cater for the needs of market vendors recognizing self-employment and the voluntary nature of contributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.