ArticlePloS one2025
A systemic approach to estimate and validate RP-HPLC assay method for remdesivir and favipiravir in capsule dosage form.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of quality by design offer quality and safety product to patients, efficient processes for continuous improvements to manufacturers, negligible amount of batch failures and robust product quality attributes. This study was designed to establish a simple, specific, precise, and accurate reverse phase-high performance liquid chromatographic (RP-HPLC) method for the quantitative determination of remdesivir and favipiravir in Capsule dosage forms. The RP-HPLC method was performed on a Kromasil 100A C18 column (250 mm x 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size) with a mobile phase containing (50 mL of acetonitrile, 350 mL methanol, 100ml of water and 0.5 mL of Phosphoric acid). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. The ultraviolet (UV) detection wavelength was 300 nm, and the column temperature was set at ambient. Linearity and range stock solutions were prepared as 50% to 150%. The calibration curves showed a good linear response ranged from 0.02 to 0.06 mg/ml (r=1.0000) for favipiravir and 0.022 to 0.066 mg/ml (r=1.0000) for remdesivir, and the average recoveries were 99.9% for favipiravir and 99.8% for remdesivir in assay test. The retention time of favipiravir was RT 11.5 minutes and remdesivir 20.95 minutes, tailing factor was not more than 1.5 and resolution of more than 2.0 respectively. The extended run time was supported by high concentration of favipiravir and uneven peak behavior of remdesivir in single run, which disturb resolution, retention times, injection repeatability. Reducing runtime on HPLC will lead to coelution of peaks, poor resolution, and loss of sensitivity during degradation profiling. This issue may be overcome with future UHPLC technique. The method was validated in accordance to International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines. The limit of detection (LOD) for Favipiravir was 0.104mg/ml and Remdesivir was 0.052mg/ml and limit of quantification (LOQ) for Favipiravir was 0.316mg/ml and Remdesivir was 0.158mg/ml respectively. In stress conditions, this product undergoes degradation and was considered sensitive to Acid, Alkali, Oxidation, reduction, hydrolysis, high temperature and humidity. The assay methods was simple, rapid, sensitive, repeatable, eco-friendly, stability indicating and can be used cost-effectively for the testing of these two drug substances in capsule dosage form. Due to the emergent need of antivirals for flu management, this coloaded combination was considered as dire need of society. Also, we reported that the product must be stored under ambient temperature, low humidity, and protected from light exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.