Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232932›Full record

ReviewCancer cytopathology2025

Cytology-Radiology Correlation Series: Pancreatic cytopathology.

Judy Trieu, Andrew Gilman, Katerina Konstantinoff, Maria D Lozano, Mauro Saieg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer cytopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Judy TrieuDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Andrew GilmanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Katerina KonstantinoffMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Maria D LozanoDepartment of Pathology, University of Navarra-, Pamplona, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6796-9380
Mauro SaiegDepartment of Pathology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9438-226X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of pancreatic lesions has increased over the years because of an increase in accessibility to and the quality of cross-sectional imaging. This commentary describes the common non-neoplastic and neoplastic pancreatic lesions. The images in this commentary depict classic cross-sectional images, sonographic findings, and the cytopathologic diagnosis of each lesion. Most common non-neoplastic lesions include pseudocysts, autoimmune pancreatitis, and chronic pancreatitis. Most common neoplastic lesions include serous cystadenomas, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms, solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, neuroendocrine tumors, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, acinar cell carcinoma, and metastases to the pancreas. The aim of this Cytoimaging Correlation Series is to demonstrate the multidisciplinary involvement in the diagnosis of pancreatic pathology and to highlight main findings in the most common entities found in everyday practice.

Indexed as

CytodiagnosisPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsHumanscytopathologyendoscopic ultrasound (EUS)endoscopyimagingpancreatic cytopathology

Identifiers

PMID40232932
PMCPMC11999058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.