ArticleJCI insight2025
Characterization of a pathogenic nonmigratory fibroblast population in systemic sclerosis skin.
Article in JCI insight, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunological mechanisms underlying fibrotic diseases via single-cell technologies.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fibroblasts are central to pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, studies of conventional explant fibroblast cultures incompletely reflect disease biology and treatment response. We isolated a second nonmigratory "resident" population of fibroblasts from skin biopsies after outgrowth of explant "migratory" cells. These nonmotile resident fibroblasts were compared with migratory cells from the same biopsy, using functional studies, bulk and single-cell RNA-seq, and localized in situ by multichannel immunofluorescence. Migratory and resident fibroblast populations in SSc showed distinct profibrotic characteristics and gene expression for pathogenic pathways differing by stage and autoantibody subgroup. TGF-β signaling was highly active in migratory fibroblasts in early-stage diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc). Conversely, resident fibroblasts had less upregulated TGF-β signaling, especially in late-stage dcSSc. Increased chemokine expression was a hallmark of resident fibroblasts at all stages. In vitro studies confirmed differential response to TGF-β1 and CCL2 between migratory and resident cells. We suggest that migratory fibroblasts are especially important in early skin disease, whereas nonmigratory fibroblasts may have a regulatory role and contribute more to fibrosis in later-stage disease. Thus, we have identified a pathogenic fibroblast population in SSc, not isolated by conventional explant culture, that could play an important role in fibrosis and be targeted therapeutically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.