Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232795›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Steeper social discounting after human basolateral amygdala damage.

Tobias Kalenscher, Luca M Lüpken, Ron Stoop, David Terburg, Jack van Honk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Amygdala and Politics.Brain sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Social Reward Learning Deficits and Concordant Brain Alterations in Rats Overexpressing Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia 1 (DISC1).The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Steeper social discounting after human basolateral amygdala damage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tobias KalenscherComparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0358-9020
Luca M LüpkenComparative Psychology, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7770-248X
Ron StoopDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Lausanne, Prilly 1008, Switzerland.
David TerburgDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2356-8734
Jack van HonkDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CS, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7955-6500

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) KA 2675/7-1Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF) IZLCZ0_206045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translational research suggests that the basolateral part of the amygdala (BLA) computes some of the core processes underlying social preferences, but its precise role in prosocial choice remains unclear. We hypothesize that the human BLA is not necessary for prosocial behavior per se, but fine-tunes the degree of prosociality as a function of the social distance between actor and recipient of a prosocial act. We tested five participants with Urbach-Wiethe disease (UWD) who had isolated, bilateral damage to BLA and compared their behavior in a modified dictator game to that of 16 healthy control participants matched for (neuro-) psychological traits and cultural and socioeconomic background. In this game, participants selected eight people from their social environment and assigned them to variable social distance levels ranging from 1 (emotionally closest person) to 100 (random stranger on the street). They decided how much of a monetary endowment they would share with each person at each social distance. Compared to controls, UWD participants were less generous overall and showed steeper social discounting, that is, their willingness to share declined more sharply with increasing social distance. This difference in social discounting could not be explained by empathy, personality, or social network size. Our data suggest that BLA is critical for resolving the conflict between selfish and altruistic motives during social discounting. This finding underlines the BLA's role in model-based social cognition, calibrating prosocial behavior based on the social-emotional distance between individuals.

Indexed as

AmygdalaBasolateral Nuclear ComplexSocial BehaviorAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedaltruismbasolateral amygdalabrain lesionprosocialsocial discounting

Identifiers

PMID40232795
PMCPMC12037017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.