ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025
The relationship between rhythm perception abilities and perceptual learning in syllable- versus stress-timed languages.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning to Understand Speech in Babble Noise: The Role of Rhythm Perception in English and Spanish.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between rhythm perception abilities and perceptual learning of speech in noise cross-linguistically, with native listeners of both English (stress-timed) and Spanish (syllable-timed). Forty native listeners of each language participated in a pre-test, training, and post-test perceptual learning paradigm using speech masked by white noise. All participants also completed the Musical Ear Test to assess rhythm perception discrimination abilities. Results showed no significant difference in rhythm perception between the two groups, suggesting that native language does not influence sensitivity to rhythm perception. Significant perceptual learning of speech in noise was observed for both English and Spanish listeners and to a similar degree. However, rhythm perception abilities strongly predicted perceptual learning for English listeners but not for Spanish listeners. This study provides evidence for cross-linguistic differences in how listeners utilize rhythmic cues in the perceptual learning of speech in noise and suggests that rhythmic cues play a greater role in perceptual learning for English where rhythmic variability is higher, compared to Spanish, in which perceptual learning may rely more on segmental information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.