Observational studyJAMA network open2025
Improving Health Care Transition for Young Patients With Sickle Cell Disease Through Quality Network.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing Barriers to Transitioning Pediatric Patients With Epilepsy to Adult Health Care in the United States: A Narrative Review.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2026Review
- Mechanism-informed transition from pediatric to adult care in sickle cell disease: a case study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Building a framework for adolescent and young adult transition of care for patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and neurofibromatosis type 2-related schwannomatosis syndromes.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Transitioning from pediatric to adult health care is crucial for the continuity of care for young adults with sickle cell disease. Among 5 pediatric hematology practices participating in the Florida Pediatric Hematology Learning and Action Network, 3 practices lacked transition programs before this quality improvement project. Objective: To evaluate the implementation of programs to improve care for individuals transitioning from pediatric to adult care for sickle cell disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter observational quality improvement study was conducted at 5 pediatric hematology centers in Florida. All patients with sickle cell disease ages 14 to 21 years without neurocognitive impairment who attended 1 of the 5 centers over the project period were included. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to December 2023. Exposure: The network participated in virtual learning about quality improvement and the Got Transition health care transition framework. Clinics organized transition programs and used the Model for Improvement and plan-do-study-act cycles. Readiness assessments and transition plans were implemented. Data updates were conducted every month. P-charts were created to present aggregate and individual practice improvement. Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentage of patients with sickle cell disease ages 14 to 21 years attending a clinic at each center with a readiness assessment and a transition plan at least once during the previous 12 months as verified by monthly electronic health record (EHR) audits. Results: Among 627 patients who met criteria for transition implementation because of age and diagnosis, 458 patients were assessed (240 male [52.4%] and 218 female [47.6%]). Collective change initiatives included educating the clinical staff about the health care transition framework, establishing processes for identifying eligible patients using the patient roster, and creating reliable processes and procedures to ensure that patients had a readiness assessment and transition plan. Over the 19-month project, monthly EHR reviews of 100% or a sample of 10 random EHRs demonstrated an increase in the aggregate mean percentage of eligible patients with readiness assessment from 68.8% (95% CI, 63.1%-74.5%) to 87.8% (95% CI, 85.6%-89.5%), representing a 27.6% improvement. The aggregate transition plan increased from 58.8% (95% CI, 53.3%-64.2%) to 81.2% (95% CI, 78.9%-83.5%), with sustained metrics for over 12-month-period. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that collaboration among centers was associated with successful achievement of goals. Educating and sharing responsibilities among all center clinicians, identifying patients ahead of time through EHR reviews and clinic-staff huddles, and having electronic versions of readiness assessment and dot phrases to document plans were associated with sustained outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.