Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40232718›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Camaraderie Among US Veterans and Their Preferences for Health Care Systems and Practitioners.

Kevin Vigilante, Sonja V Batten, Qingkun Shang, Shiping Zhang, Wenshu Li, Regina Little, Paula P Schnurr, Kenneth W Kizer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Once and Future Veterans Health Administration.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin VigilanteBooz Allen Hamilton, McLean, Virginia.
Sonja V BattenStop Soldier Suicide, Durham, North Carolina.
Qingkun ShangBooz Allen Hamilton, McLean, Virginia.
Shiping ZhangBooz Allen Hamilton, McLean, Virginia.
Wenshu LiFoundation Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Regina LittleBooz Allen Hamilton, McLean, Virginia.
Paula P SchnurrNational Center for PTSD, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont.
Kenneth W KizerUC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Unlike convenience, cost, and quality, camaraderie with other similar patients has not been reported as a prominent patient consideration when choosing a health care system or practitioner. As the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health System expands choice of practitioners for its enrollees, it is important to identify ways to promote veteran camaraderie in community care settings. Objective: To determine whether camaraderie with other veterans is important to veterans using the VA Health System. Design, Setting, and Participants: In 2019, a web-based survey was administered to veterans who reported using VA health care. The survey included questions about cultural factors, such as camaraderie, practitioners' understanding of veterans, trust of VA caregivers, and a scenario-based question to ascertain whether veterans would choose VA or private health care if cost and distance were equivalent. Data analysis was performed from November 2024 to January 2025. Exposure: Using the VA health care system. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the importance of camaraderie in selecting a health care system or practitioner, measured as the percentage of veterans who reported positive ratings on relevant survey items. Results: In this survey study of 652 veterans, the majority were male (486 veterans [74.54%]). Respondents were categorized into 3 age groups: 18 to 34 years (246 veterans [37.73%]), 35 to 64 years (320 veterans [49.08%]), and 65 years and older (86 veterans [13.19%]). In total, 52.41% of respondents rated camaraderie and being around other veterans as important; this increased to 75.88% among veterans aged 18 to 34 years and to 65.35% for those aged 35 to 64 years. For those aged 65 years and older, only 35.75% felt it was important. When asked whether they would choose VA or a private sector health system if cost and travel distance were equal, 69.00% of respondents indicated they would choose VA. The risk-adjusted model demonstrated those who valued being around veterans at VA were 2.24 times more likely (95% CI, 1.81-2.77) to choose VA. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of 652 veterans, camaraderie was important to most of these VA Health System users, especially younger veterans. As VA provides more choice of practitioners to its enrollees, it will be important to consider ways to preserve veterans' ability to affiliate with other veterans in community care settings, especially for younger veterans who are often challenged in transitioning from military service to civilian life.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesPatient PreferenceVeteransAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID40232718
PMCPMC12000971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.